Why were the 1988 olympics boycotted




















Such commitment now looks all but dead after a quick deterioration in inter-Korean relations amid a stalemate in larger nuclear negotiations between Washington and Pyongyang. Sections U. Science Technology Business U. She was clocked at Behind her is Natalia Pomoshchnikova of the Soviet Union, who finished sixth in the race.

Connect with the definitive source for global and local news. And the Games were considered a huge financial success, with almost double the ticket sales of Montreal and earning the title as the most-seen event in TV history.

The Details : Angered over not being allowed to co-host the Games with South Korea , North Korea refused to attend the event in neighboring Seoul. The boycotts couldn't outshine the fact that the Olympics, the last Games of the Cold War era, set a new record for the number of nations and athletes 8, participating.

Of Note : Scandals tarnished the Seoul Games, including reports of residents being forced from their homes and homeless people being detained at facilities in preparation for the Games.

Canadian sprinter Ben Johnson made global headlines when he was stripped of his world-record-setting meter victory after testing positive for steroids, and controversial boxing calls that went against South Korean athletes caused outrage. North and South Korean leaders met following the events, and agreed to send a combined team to the Tokyo Summer Games. However, North Korea announced in April that it would not participate because of the coronavirus pandemic.

But if you see something that doesn't look right, click here to contact us! Twice a week we compile our most fascinating features and deliver them straight to you. Live TV. This Day In History. History Vault. The s was a tumultuous time in the history of the Olympic Games, amid international unrest and a current of underlying distrust between nations. A time when capitalism and communism added to geopolitical lines and created deep divisions between even neighbouring countries. And what better what to exemplify this than the boycott of the Olympics in Seoul by some Eastern Bloc countries.

Boycotts were nothing new to the Olympics, certainly not in years previous when a number of communist countries boycotted the Games in Los Angeles.

The reason, they claim, was because they feared for the safety of athletes competing in capitalist countries. However many believe it was in revenge for the fact that the US led a boycott of the Olympics in the USSR due to their involvement in Afghanistan. So, in the midst of all these political manoeuvres, when the time came for capitalist South Korea to assume the role of hosts for the Games, it didn't pass without its controversy.

The symbol for the 24th Summer Olympic Games in Seoul, Fidel Castro felt cheated out of the right to host the Pan-American Games in in place of Ecuador Indianapolis was ultimately selected as the venue. Korea was a divided nation. Shared Games could symbolically help overcome this division, improve security, and assure maximum participation. It may well have been that Kim Il Sung was open to both possibilities: ruining the Games or sharing the Games. In the end, he was outmaneuvered on both counts.

The positions were clear and apparently irreconcilable. Kim [head of the North Korean National Olympic Committee] and he pressed his own point in a very determined manner.

Their meetings were part of a closely coordinated effort to build up a common front against Pyongyang. No agreement was reached on this occasion. Weeks earlier, the IOC would not even entertain this idea.

Instead, the North Koreans, displaying the self-defeating stubborn attitude so characteristic of DPRK diplomacy in general, continued to press for better terms, even though time was certainly not on their side. That said, they did retreat at the January talks from their initial maximalist demands, now asking for only eight sports—or a third of the Games.

By March Document 23 , the North Koreans were asking for only six sports, and there is indirect evidence Document 25 that they were willing to go as low as five by April. By April the South Koreans could say with greater confidence that a socialist boycott of the Games would be averted; by all indications—although by then no firm commitments had been made—the Soviet Union and China both intended to send athletes to the Seoul Games.

Samaranch had long suspected that, at least in relation to the USSR. A further indication that the USSR would not boycott the Games was that small groups of Soviet athletes actually visited Seoul on several occasions in It can bury the entire Olympic movement.

By June the Chinese announced their decision to participate in the Asian Games in Seoul these took place later that year. But our opinions often do not coincide. The writing was on the wall—it certainly was for President Chun Doo-hwan. Chun warned Samaranch not to be taken in by the North Korean threats. It is true that [North] Korea has more arms than we have but they do not have the means to fight against us and the US forces based in my country.

North Korea is not in a position to attack us. I can assure you that that country does not want war either. Without the support of these two countries, North Korea can do absolutely nothing and if it were to do something, that would be an act of self-destruction.

If they want a fight, they would have it, but it would be suicide on their part. If Kim Il Sung, in reality, was a paper tiger, it was not necessary to bend over backwards to make concessions. In another meeting with Samaranch, on April 25, Document 26 , Chun Doo Hwan elaborated his views of North Korea in a brutally frank matter, which betrayed no real propensity towards compromise solutions.

However, both Chun and Samaranch appeared to be on the same page in terms of their overall aims. The North Koreans were playing an equally sophisticated game.

Before the third round of talks in Lausanne that June, they sought Soviet support. Or, the North Korean appeal could have been a tactical trick to lure the Soviets into making an unconditional commitment to Pyongyang so that the latter could make unreasonable demands on the IOC and ruin the talks in the expectation of a Soviet boycott.

Samaranch had earlier offered them three sports, so, at the face of it, the two sides were very close to an agreement, that is, if Hwang Jang-yeop actually meant what he said. On this point, Yakovlev was not forthcoming. He told Hwang outright that there was no question of the Soviet Union boycotting the Games. If the pressure was that great, Samaranch would have not done what he did during the third round of talks in Lausanne, on June , Document 28 , when he apparently went back on the earlier informal offer to the North Koreans.

The President had understood from what Mr. This was the moment of truth.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000